Overview
What is UXPin?
UXPin is a UX design platform with wireframing, prototyping and interactive mockup features.
UXPin - Very good tool at first, but if you're a serious designer move along
UXPin is the best design tool
UXPin for Better UX
UXPin: A One-Stop-Shop for Design Workflows
UXPin for CRO
Beware of losing hours of work!
Great for Remote Teams to Collaborate, Get Feedback and Iterate!
UXPin:
- is used by the product designers to build with interactive …
UXPin has my vote for being the best tool for wire framing user experience workflows
I love UXPin and here's why...
UXPin
Intuitive, organized, fast tool for wireframing.
Pricing
What is UXPin?
UXPin is a UX design platform with wireframing, prototyping and interactive mockup features.
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
2 people also want pricing
Alternatives Pricing
What is Figma?
Figma, headquartered in San Francisco, offers their collaborative design and prototyping application to support digital product and UI development.
What is Adobe XD?
Adobe XD is a prototyping and UX/UI option for website and mobile application design, featuring a range of UI tools and and templates, a versatile artboard and contextual layer panels, and deep integration with Adobe's creative suite of products for fast import of objects from these applications.
Product Demos
Demo'ing my EduMenu Mock-up via UXPin
Product Details
- About
- Tech Details
What is UXPin?
UXPin Video
UXPin Technical Details
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
---|---|
Mobile Application | No |
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(21)Community Insights
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
- Recommendations
UXPin has become an essential tool for designers and teams looking to streamline the wireframing and prototyping process. Users have found that UXPin allows them to create website and app wireframes, as well as development specification documents, all in one platform. The ability to share working wireframes with clients has been particularly valuable, as clients can click through proposed app screens and website pages, gaining a better understanding of the design concepts. This has facilitated collaboration and feedback on UX proposals, promoting transparency and demonstrating the effectiveness of proposed approaches.
With UXPin's intuitive interface and robust tools, designers are able to quickly create layouts that can be easily adjusted based on client feedback. The tool's smart elements have been praised for speeding up the workflow and enabling the creation of interactive designs. Additionally, the documentation section of UXPin serves as a valuable asset for teams, allowing them to clarify details not immediately evident in the wireframes. This feature ensures that everyone is on the same page and helps prevent any potential misunderstandings or missed elements. Overall, UXPin has provided designers with a powerful solution for wireframing and prototyping, enhancing collaboration among team members and ultimately reducing costs and saving time in the design process.
Documentation and Context: Users have found the ability to add documentation to projects helpful for further defining functionality and flow. This feature enhances the overall understanding of project requirements for multiple reviewers.
Visual Design Capabilities: Reviewers appreciate the option to add images and other files to projects, allowing for visually appealing blueprints that can be easily shared with clients. This feature enables users to create engaging prototypes that help clients visualize the final product.
Collaboration and Communication: Users love the convenience of sharing project previews with clients, making it easy for them to understand the functionality and flow of their products. This capability streamlines communication processes and keeps clients up-to-date with project progress.
Limited Undo Functionality: Some users have expressed frustration with the undo functionality in UXPin, noting that it only allows for a single undo and can sometimes lead to unintended changes that are difficult to revert.
Slow Performance: Several reviewers have mentioned that they found the software to be slow, including the mockups and editor, which negatively impacts their overall user experience.
Lack of Live Customer Support: Many users have voiced disappointment with the lack of live customer support or chat option in UXPin, finding it frustrating to rely solely on email support for assistance.
Based on user reviews, here are the three most common recommendations for UXPin:
-
Try out the free trial: Many users recommend giving UXPin a try by taking advantage of their free trial. This allows users to explore the features and capabilities of the tool before making a commitment.
-
Use it for wireframing and prototyping: UXPin is frequently recommended for its power and ease of use in wireframing and prototyping. Users find it helpful for designing UI/UX interfaces, creating high-fidelity prototypes, and collaborating with team members.
-
Explore other options: Some users suggest investigating other more intuitive products first before opting for UXPin. While they acknowledge its strengths in online collaboration and browser-based prototyping, they advise considering alternative tools like Marvel or Pixate if ease-of-use is a priority.
It is important to note that while UXPin receives positive recommendations overall, some users mention quirks and room for improvement, such as challenges with constant iteration and performance issues with large numbers of elements.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-5 of 5)- Getting a subscription
- Sharing projects and mockups
- Implementing a simple mockup
- You have to call to cancel your subscription
- Platform is very slow, mockups are slow, editor is slow.
- Customer service is a joke
- Lots of e-mail spam
If you are an advanced designer with specific client requirements never use UXPin. Don't even get started because you will waste your time. Example is their component feature, it has a lot, but misses very crucial aspects to be functional on a broader scale.
- Sharing mockups
- Building mockups
- Exporting png's for presentations
- Too expensive; every contributor is a full account, viewer or editor
- Making designs is very slow and expensive because lack of components
- ROI is bad overall
UXPin is the best design tool
- Collaboration with teammates.
- Rapid prototyping.
- Design Systems.
- JSON File for content importing.
- Bulk editing via library components.
- Interactions, and micro UX.
- Sharing and requesting feedback.
- Version branching.
- Spec mode for developers (access to assets).
- Automatically produced visual style guide with fonts, colors, and imported assets.
- Imports from sketch while keeping the shapes, colors, and fonts fully editable.
- Boolean Pen (bezzier pen) for vector drawing, and pathfinder.
- Annotation capability via documentation mode.
- Password protect prototypes.
- Upload custom fonts (enterprise, or Pro version is key imho).
- 1,000s of built in icons (iOS, Android, Font Awesome etc).
- Prebuilt design component libraries (Material Design, Booptstrap, iOS).
- Video tutorials in-app.
- Moderate learning curve - UI is familiar, and customizable.
- Copy/paste interactions, and element properties.
- Canvas properties (grids, adaptive screen sizes, scrolling).
- Asynchronous Spell check.
- UXPin's customer support is top tier.
- No search and replace for fonts (missing or just to replace).
- Tool is built for design/dev teams but does not integrate content teams in well.
- If you are not careful you can get lost in designing interactions when you should be just creating building blocks - don’t over animate!!!
- There is currently no “scrub” or click-drag interaction which limits touch capability testing/concepts.
- Editing adaptive versions of designs is very time consuming, edits to not ripple through from master viewport size. All updates are manual, even when creating an adaptive version.
- When a library item is updated, it can revert changes you have made unknowingly.
- Video integration is limited to online video host aggregators such as IMGR, YouTube, and Vimeo.
- Not a ton of info for a designer on how to use the expressions effectively.
- Prototypes with a lot of interactions can get slow, especially on computers with a lot of security software. It’s best to work with UXPin to figure out what is blocking APIs, and JS.
Some say this tool is only for building “full apps” or “complex experiences” but it really is a simple, and elegant tool to use for small projects too. The hardest part is committing to a new tool, which I can admit is tough. But this works so much like sketch and I don’t feel like the capabilities come through their website.
Having said that, I wouldn’t use this if I were going to try to simulate an application that had any sort of real-time click dragging, such as drag and dropping, or sliding of on screen visual elements because there are better tools out there for such interactions, and I am very specific on how real interactions are for my prototypes.
I really like doing cool micro animations such as the hamburger to the X, as well as smoothly animating page elements. However I would avoid doing complex animations or drawings/ logos with states—keep those in lottie or after effects and import them.
- Quicker team alignment - a prototype is worth 1,000 meetings.
- Quicker results from testing - fail faster.
- More accurate development output.
- Builds understanding of what is needed amongst team success (what designers need vs what developers need).
UXPin for Better UX
With UXPin, we're able to share working wireframes to allow our clients the ability to click through their proposed app screens and website pages. It also helps our development teams determine if something is really going to work or not before they go through all of the coding required to make something happen. The documentation section of UXPin has been a big asset for our teams in the last year. It helps our developers to spell out additional things that may not be as obvious when reviewing the wireframes. It also allows our clients a better way to provide feedback on the app and web flows we share with them.
- Allows you to add documentation to the projects you create in order to further define functionality and flow.
- Allows you to add images and other files to the projects you create in order to share a prettier blueprint of your projects to your clients.
- Allows you to share previews of the projects you create easily with your clients.
- Gives you a quick method for helping clients understand the functionality and flow of their product (i.e. a website, an app, etc.)
- It would be nice to have the documentation available within the simulation so you don't have to toggle between the two.
UXPin also helps our clients understand the purpose of a sitemap. We used to send our clients a sitemap in an outline format. While many understood that the top-level items on the outline were the main navigation of their website and other items were child pages, several did not. We have found that using UXPin to show the main level navigation, how in-page navigation and child pages (drop-down menus from the main navigation) work has been an integral step in getting approval on sitemaps.
- Being able to work more efficiently always has a positive impact on our ROI and UXPin contributes to that.
- Being able to visually show how something is going to flow or work keeps us from having to explain things multiple times to clients, and therefore, it provides a positive impact on our client relationships.
- Giving our development teams the ability to work through flow and function before they begin coding has saved us thousands of dollars in development time.
- Marvel
- Creating Development Specifications for Apps
- Creating App Flows
- Creating Website Flows
- Creating Visual Sitemaps
- Using UXPin to illustrate sitemaps
- Using UXPin to create development specifications for apps
UXPin: A One-Stop-Shop for Design Workflows
- Robust ability to create both lo-fi and high fidelity prototypes—There are plenty of tools to use libraries, add animations, drag and drop Sketch files into designs, and use other functionalities to create designs.
- Ability to annotate prototypes—The great annotation tool enables users to explain nuances and details for stakeholders, particularly for more complicated designs.
- Ability to create tasks for user testing—Within the same platform you create a prototype, and you can list out the user testing tasks and send them along with a link to the prototype to testers. Note that you can even record and view testing recordings within this same platform.
- Ability to create team libraries—UXPin allows users to create team libraries, which is great for brand and design consistency across designs and across projects.
- Could be more intuitive—My team has been using UXPin for several months now, and it still feels like we are learning how to use it. It’s great to have a robust tool, but it’s not saving us any time when we’re still struggling to figure it out.
- Can’t speak to or chat live with customer support—When things go wrong or get confusing, having to wait for an email is pretty frustrating.
- It can be slow with more complex designs—UXPin is great for smaller designs, but the platform can get buggy and lag behind with more complex prototypes.
- Saving money by using one tool for lo-fi wireframing, high fidelity wireframing, prototyping, and user testing, rather than four separate tools.
- The ability to create and use team libraries enables us to create visually consistent designs with less effort than creating every single design from scratch, which allows us to save considerable time (and therefore money!)
- In-platform collaboration saves our team a lot of time and energy. With everything in one place (wireframes, prototypes, user feedback, collaboration comments), we can all be on the same page about the design workflow and pinpoint discussion points that are based on up-to-date designs.
Beware of losing hours of work!
- Interface is clean
- Cloud based
- Lost half a day's work (3 hours).
- Customer support lied to us telling us it was because we must have had an inconsistent internet connection. This makes no sense at all - we worked for full hours uploading images and other media to the document - all of which was saved continuosly. On top of that there was still one of the elements remaining at the end of the blank page which proves the previous addition of elements had been saved.
- Customer support is only available via email.
- Community website is buggy - not possible to use search field to search for help topics.
- Lost half a day's work and became very frustrated with customer support and service.